INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Getting Started in Huron IRB
- Log into Huron IRB using your NID
- Visit the Help Center and review the Quick Reference Guides and Videos
- Application instructions for studies reviewed by the UCF IRB
- Application instructions for studies reviewed by an external IRB
Other Committee Reviews
Research investigators should be aware that other UCF committees approvals may be needed. These committees may include but are not limited to Biosafety, Radiation, Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
Review Of Grant Applications
The University of Central Florida IRB requests that copies of federal grant applications be submitted with IRB protocols. The following questions and answers are provided to explain this requirement.
Why is the IRB requiring that a copy of the grant be submitted?
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regulations at 45 CFR 46.103(f) require that each application or proposal for HHS-supported human subject research be reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board. The University of Central Florida is obliged, therefore, to review these proposals.
What portion of the grant must be submitted?
Investigators must submit a copy of the entire proposal (exclusive of appendices). If a grant is linked to multiple IRB protocols then the IRB needs to know which protocols so that they can all be reviewed. Only one copy of the grant proposal is required in the IRB office. The IRB cannot review a protocol unless the entire grant application has been submitted.
What exactly is the IRB looking for?
The grant proposal must be found to be consistent with information related to the protection of human subjects. Examples include information about (i) the number and qualifications of collaborating investigators and other members of the research team; (ii) cooperating institutions or performance sites that may require separate or additional IRB review or an Assurance of Compliance; (iii) characteristics of proposed research facilities that may affect subject safety or the confidentiality of data; (iv) the feasibility of financial commitments made to subjects; and (v) the cost of proposed subject protection measures, such as consent monitors or translators.
What will happen if the research protocol is found to be inconsistent with the proposal?
The IRB protocol must be consistent with the grant proposal. Any discrepancies will require the PI to either amend the current protocol or to submit a new protocol that is consistent with the grant application. If the IRB and PI are unable to reconcile these differences, then the Office of Research & Commercialization will be contacted regarding this discrepancy and the availability of funds in the account may be affected until the IRB determines that the application and protocol are consistent.